Skip to main content
The Lie of New More Accurate Manuscripts
KJV critics claim there have been new more accurate manuscripts found since 1611 that were not available to the KJV translators.
It is true that there have been new manuscripts found since 1611. It is not true that they are more accurate than the Received Text of the KJV.
Even though there have been new manuscripts found since 1611, there have been no new renditions of the manuscripts that were then available to the KJV translators.
The Sinaiticus was not available to the KJV translators, but the similar Vaticanus was available and rejected by the KJV translators
The discovered manuscripts support the Received Text and the KJV.
The recently discovered manuscripts support the accuracy of the Received Text and the KJV.
There are no readings available today which were not already in the hands of the King James translators.
The newly discovered manuscripts add to the volume of the majority texts of Antioch.
The truth about the Dead Sea Scrolls.
The fact is these manuscripts are in total agreement with the Received Text and the KJV.